I think we all no this game well enough, but i think there is something that is missing, because on all of the reviews, we only get to see the good stuff aside from the bugs that had never been fixed. Its a fun game but not long lasting like other role playing game as the developer create the storyline of this game rather plainly. Roughly speaking, its a one way game that provides us with an assassin killing some bad people and finding the true meaning of being an assassin (from Altair's view). 
Yes, true, Assassin's Creed is a beautiful game to look at from afar.  The visuals  are impressive, and the animation is particularly slick and fluid,  especially when you're in the middle of free running segments or  bouncing over rooftops and all.  Similarly, if you understand swordplay, you'll  recognize the flowing nature of parrying and attacks that makes combat  rather enjoyable (even if you have to relearn simple things like  countering strikes all over again).  However, when you get closer and  you see the constant amount of pop-in of items and NPCs, repeated render  passes, textures that tear and other visual issues, you can't help but  feel like some bugs weren't fully eliminated.  Perhaps this is because  solving elements like the repetitious gameplay elements for  assassinations or the buggy visuals were somewhat lost in favor of the  bigger picture, which was the set up for an obvious sequel.  The future  context comes across more as an interruption than a device to help push  the plot forward, and its clunky segments, coupled with its abrupt and  disappointing ending will probably have fans throwing controllers at  screens after they've invested dozens of hours exploring the secrets of  Acre, Damascus and Jerusalem.  Had the game kept its focus squarely  within the time period of the Crusades and only at the end explained its  Matrix-like attachments to the real world, the supposed cliff hanger  would have been much better.  As it stands now, Assassin's Creed is one  of those titles that was big on promise, but short in some ways on its  overall execution.
Being one with the crowd.
Cinematic view from above.
If you play Assassin's Creed for an hour, you will probably think it's a  fantastic game. But as Assassin's progresses, its dual storylines and  repetitive quests begin to grow tiresome. There are so many great  individual elements, but they are lost among the myriad of poor  decisions from Ubisoft Montreal. Wasting the big twist on the first five  minutes of gameplay is a tremendous mistake, but not nearly as damaging  as the ill-conceived assassination investigation quests, which get old  fast. The exploration aspects of Assassin's Creed and the combat are  both plusses in my book. But those two elements are only part of the  whole.
I would give the games's presentation : 9.0
Graphics                                          : 9.0
Sound                                              : 8.0
Gameplay                                        : 8.5
Overall Value  : 8.6
And to add my point of view, this game rocks as hell and I hope the sequel would be more than just a plain rolling storyline. This review is just a make-up, but i'll put some of my views later. I just need to have a revision on how to do this reviews. sorry if you don't like my review (on second thought its not). Happy gaming everybody.



 
 
y are u not writing any reviews after this
ReplyDelete